STESA
DownloadTélécharger
Actions
Vote :
ScreenshotAperçu
Informations
Catégorie :Category: nCreator TI-Nspire
Auteur Author: 2B9877U
Type : Classeur 3.0.1
Page(s) : 1
Taille Size: 2.32 Ko KB
Mis en ligne Uploaded: 06/04/2025 - 18:32:50
Uploadeur Uploader: 2B9877U (Profil)
Téléchargements Downloads: 1
Visibilité Visibility: Archive publique
Shortlink : http://ti-pla.net/a4565034
Type : Classeur 3.0.1
Page(s) : 1
Taille Size: 2.32 Ko KB
Mis en ligne Uploaded: 06/04/2025 - 18:32:50
Uploadeur Uploader: 2B9877U (Profil)
Téléchargements Downloads: 1
Visibilité Visibility: Archive publique
Shortlink : http://ti-pla.net/a4565034
Description
Fichier Nspire généré sur TI-Planet.org.
Compatible OS 3.0 et ultérieurs.
<<
Governance Check auditor relationships, length of tenure, any red flags in filings. Board of Directors A strong board can preempt risky acquisitions or long-term mismanagement. Are they (or 2 /3) independent (no direct ties to management being family or working with them or under them at the company before)? Not a fan of stock based compensation for the board, they should be like an auditor. Relevant experience? If theyre from unrelated industries, can they effectively oversee? How often is the board renewed? A staggered approach avoids complete turnover at once. Check Glass Lewis report on. CEO & Executive Compensation Salary vs. Stock Options: If purely stock-based, executives might take aggressive measures to pump share price in the short term. Like announce new trendy products or exciting acquisitions. Especially before leaving. Long-Term vs. Short-Term: Mostly coming from salary or stock options? If stock, Vesting periods and performance conditions matter. What is the bonus tied to? Share price or sustainable growth? More than one? Excessive Stock Options: Could dilute existing shareholders and incentivize risk-taking. Private Equity Influence: If coming from a PE background, management may focus on cost cuts or short-term levers to pay down debt quickly. Shareholder Structure Who holds the largest stakes? Are their interests aligned with yours? Family-owned or founder-dominated companies might have faster decision-making but less oversight. Big institutional investors are passive just align with activists of the company is not doing. Are there activist investors that may cause tumult? Anyone with 50% or more? Or parties playing to the institutionals interests and not smaller shareholders? Risks: Leverage risk, Interest rate risk, execution risk, tariff risk, reputation risk, macro and trend is risk, cybersecurity, regulatory Made with nCreator - tiplanet.org
>>
Compatible OS 3.0 et ultérieurs.
<<
Governance Check auditor relationships, length of tenure, any red flags in filings. Board of Directors A strong board can preempt risky acquisitions or long-term mismanagement. Are they (or 2 /3) independent (no direct ties to management being family or working with them or under them at the company before)? Not a fan of stock based compensation for the board, they should be like an auditor. Relevant experience? If theyre from unrelated industries, can they effectively oversee? How often is the board renewed? A staggered approach avoids complete turnover at once. Check Glass Lewis report on. CEO & Executive Compensation Salary vs. Stock Options: If purely stock-based, executives might take aggressive measures to pump share price in the short term. Like announce new trendy products or exciting acquisitions. Especially before leaving. Long-Term vs. Short-Term: Mostly coming from salary or stock options? If stock, Vesting periods and performance conditions matter. What is the bonus tied to? Share price or sustainable growth? More than one? Excessive Stock Options: Could dilute existing shareholders and incentivize risk-taking. Private Equity Influence: If coming from a PE background, management may focus on cost cuts or short-term levers to pay down debt quickly. Shareholder Structure Who holds the largest stakes? Are their interests aligned with yours? Family-owned or founder-dominated companies might have faster decision-making but less oversight. Big institutional investors are passive just align with activists of the company is not doing. Are there activist investors that may cause tumult? Anyone with 50% or more? Or parties playing to the institutionals interests and not smaller shareholders? Risks: Leverage risk, Interest rate risk, execution risk, tariff risk, reputation risk, macro and trend is risk, cybersecurity, regulatory Made with nCreator - tiplanet.org
>>
