critor wrote:ControlX does decompress the Boot2 image in RAM, then patch it if it belongs to the supported images (the one with the best support being 4.0.3), then launch it.
We have the boot2 raw code right, and what language is it in?
Does Boot2 do anything that could not be rewritten/replicated by a potential homebrew replacement? (like special decryption/encyrption, os loading protocols that we cannot replicate)
If it doesn't, then would it be possible to replace Boot2 with a "better" piece of software that potentially is not as picky as the TI Boot2 regarding things such as OS version or CAS/num? (even though I know it would not pass a signaature check, could it potentially work with ControlX)
P.S. @parrotgeek1 Thank you for looking into it at all, I hope you get well soon (not just so you can fix this bug, but it certainly won't hurt if you do )